Ancaman perintah sekatan bersuara terhadap Adendum Diraja yang diarahkan oleh hakim untuk kerajaan memohon secara rasmi pada hari Isnin, 20 Januari, telah mencetuskan perdebatan meluas. Pelbagai kiriman sarkastik telah membanjiri media sosial, dengan sesetengah melihatnya sebagai penjelasan prerogatif diraja, ada yang berkata mengenai sekatan hak bersuara, manakala yang lain melihatnya sebagai ancaman kepada kebebasan kehakiman.
The laughable threat of a gag order on the Royal Addendum, which the judge has directed the government to formally apply for by Monday, 20 January, has sparked widespread debate. Memes and sarcastic posts have flooded social media, with some viewing it as a clarification of the royal prerogative, while others see it as a potential threat to judicial independence.
Commentary and Analysis by Joe Fernandez
Umno President Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, 68, after having argued that he has "immunity" in 47 charges facing him, has...
BOOK REVIEW: "Irregular Migrants and the Sea at the Borders of Sabah, Malaysia", 188 Pages, published by Palgrave Macmillan.
The just-released book, which began as...
MACC Chief aside, other parties may come under forensic accounting and due diligence.
The Securities Commission (SC) probably couldn't look for the law which can...
MELBOURNE, Australia - Violence against wives of political leaders can be physical, sexual or psychological in nature. Both men and women can be affected...
ULASAN oleh Joe Fernandez
Pada asasnya, sebuah Pendapat bukanlah undang-undang. Perihal ini perlu dinyatakan terlebih dahulu. Hanya mahkamah yang berhak dan layak mengisytiharkan undang-undang.
Parlimen pula...
COMMENT and ANALYSIS by Joe Fernandez
At the very outset, it must be stated, that Opinion isn’t law. Only the court can declare law.
Parliament makes...