Keterangan Shahrol dalam kes saman sivil 1MDB kembali menjadi perhatian selepas pihak pembelaan mempersoalkan beberapa percanggahan dalam keterangannya, termasuk isu maklumat yang didakwa mengelirukan mahkamah dan PAC serta kegagalan membawa risiko penting pelaburan kepada Lembaga Pengarah.
CEO accountability is under scrutiny as former 1MDB chief executive Datuk Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi returns to the witness stand, with defence lawyers questioning where responsibility lies for decisions that led to the fund’s multibillion-ringgit losses.
ULASAN oleh Joe Fernandez
Pada asasnya, sebuah Pendapat bukanlah undang-undang. Perihal ini perlu dinyatakan terlebih dahulu. Hanya mahkamah yang berhak dan layak mengisytiharkan undang-undang.
Parlimen pula...
COMMENT and ANALYSIS by Joe Fernandez
At the very outset, it must be stated, that Opinion isn’t law. Only the court can declare law.
Parliament makes...
Keputusan kes Najib membawa satu norma baru dalam proses pembuatan keputusan bagi sebuah organisasi. Melalui keputusan kehakiman jelas telah mengabaikan tanggungjawab Ahli Lembaga Pengarah...
The Court of Appeal dismissed an application by former prime minister Najib Razak to adduce further oral evidence in his appeal against his conviction...
Despite the latest bombshell brought by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Corporation (MACC) on the involvement of former Malaysia’s Central Bank (BNM) Governor, Zeti Akhtar Aziz’s...