Ancaman perintah sekatan bersuara terhadap Adendum Diraja yang diarahkan oleh hakim untuk kerajaan memohon secara rasmi pada hari Isnin, 20 Januari, telah mencetuskan perdebatan meluas. Pelbagai kiriman sarkastik telah membanjiri media sosial, dengan sesetengah melihatnya sebagai penjelasan prerogatif diraja, ada yang berkata mengenai sekatan hak bersuara, manakala yang lain melihatnya sebagai ancaman kepada kebebasan kehakiman.
The laughable threat of a gag order on the Royal Addendum, which the judge has directed the government to formally apply for by Monday, 20 January, has sparked widespread debate. Memes and sarcastic posts have flooded social media, with some viewing it as a clarification of the royal prerogative, while others see it as a potential threat to judicial independence.
High Court of Borneo recognises Sulu heirs, cured defect, in 1939!
The Sulu heirs, in seeking compensation in Arbitration for alleged Breach, will end the...
Mahkamah Tinggi Madrid, Sepanyol, pada 29 Jun tahun lalu, telah membatalkan pelantikan penimbang tara Dr. Stampa, kata Wan Junaidi
Mahkamah Rayuan Paris telah membenarkan permohonan...
Malaysia had stopped paying heirs of Sultan Sulu annual RM5,300 cession money since 2013 after the Lahad Datu armed incursion
TWO of Petronas’ subsidiaries in...
No court in the world would go against former Attorney General (Thomas) if he chose 'discreet silence'.
It's not entirely clear what made then Attorney...