Delays in issuing written grounds of judgment are not uncommon in complex cases. But when such delays extend well beyond established timelines, do they begin to affect an accused person’s ability to exercise a meaningful right of appeal?
From Enron to Carillion, corporate failures have shown that shared decisions carry shared consequences. The SRC civil case ruling raises a difficult question — why does that principle appear unevenly applied?
Oleh Norman Sapar
Tinggal satu hari lagi baki hari berkempen untuk PRN Melaka yang bakal menentukan tampuk baru pemerintahan negeri. Jentera parti dan calon masih...