Delays in issuing written grounds of judgment are not uncommon in complex cases. But when such delays extend well beyond established timelines, do they begin to affect an accused person’s ability to exercise a meaningful right of appeal?
From Enron to Carillion, corporate failures have shown that shared decisions carry shared consequences. The SRC civil case ruling raises a difficult question — why does that principle appear unevenly applied?
By Apocryphalist
Editor's Note: Roughly a decade ago, Apocryphalist was quite a name to be reckoned with in areas of discussions regarding the Allah's Name...