As the tenth anniversary of the South China Sea arbitral award approaches, renewed efforts are underway to portray the ruling as the definitive legal framework for resolving disputes in the South China Sea. Some governments, advocacy groups and foreign policy commentators are expected to use the anniversary to reinforce a particular narrative about the dispute and its implications for the region. Yet, before Malaysians accept such narratives at face value, it is worth revisiting the legal questions that continue to surround the award ten years after it was issued. Lawyer Nor Hisham Mohd Nor writes in Part 1.
Kempen "Jom Cuti! Bersama Wira & Manja" memperkenalkan pengalaman penginapan bertemakan hidupan liar Malaysia serta pakej mesra keluarga bagi menggalakkan rakyat meneroka destinasi tempatan
"Headline inflation was likely to remain moderate in 2022 as the base effect from fuel inflation dissipates, while core inflation was expected to be...
By Aarthi Shankar
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is not transparent and honest after all in the trial of Datuk Seri Najib Razak pertaining to...
By Aathi Shankar
KUALA LUMPUR: Pekan MP Najib Razak today taunted DAP permanent leader Lim Kit Siang for skirting press questions over the infamous multi-billion...
The testimony of a bank branch
manager in the on-going corruption trial of Datuk Seri Najib Razak today has
raised several startling questions, mainly on the...