Ancaman perintah sekatan bersuara terhadap Adendum Diraja yang diarahkan oleh hakim untuk kerajaan memohon secara rasmi pada hari Isnin, 20 Januari, telah mencetuskan perdebatan meluas. Pelbagai kiriman sarkastik telah membanjiri media sosial, dengan sesetengah melihatnya sebagai penjelasan prerogatif diraja, ada yang berkata mengenai sekatan hak bersuara, manakala yang lain melihatnya sebagai ancaman kepada kebebasan kehakiman.
The laughable threat of a gag order on the Royal Addendum, which the judge has directed the government to formally apply for by Monday, 20 January, has sparked widespread debate. Memes and sarcastic posts have flooded social media, with some viewing it as a clarification of the royal prerogative, while others see it as a potential threat to judicial independence.
The group also sought clarification on the authenticity of the leak MACC report on Judge Nazlan that went viral recently and demanded that legal improprieties be addressed as they infringe on the human rights of Malaysian citizens
MACC probe has exposed the conflict of interest issues and criminal breach of judicial ethics when Judge Nazlan presided over the SRC corruption trial in the Kuala Lumpur High Court
I am keen to hear what groups like Human Rights Watch, the Int'l Bar Council and the diplomats based in Kuala Lumpur will have to say about the treatment of this case involving Najib
Kota Belud MP insists on a date to discuss issue saying it is matter of national sovereignty
An argument between Member of Parliament Isnaraissah Munirah...
Former Attorney General Tommy Thomas can't question Najib Razak’s universal popularity despite his conviction in court
Former Attorney General (AG) Tommy Thomas seems oblivious to...
The former Prime Minister can initiate developments via 'letter of representation'.
There may be a case for Najib Abdul Razak to submit a "letter of...