In a dramatic turn at the SRC trial, Najib Razak accused the prosecution of suppressing critical evidence from the US and questioned their failure to pursue the real culprits behind the 1MDB scandal. The defence argued that rushed investigations and dubious witnesses have tainted the case, highlighting Najib's ongoing fight for transparency and justice.
Dalam perkembangan dramatik di perbicaraan SRC, Najib Razak mendakwa pihak pendakwaan telah menyembunyikan bukti penting dari AS dan mempersoalkan kegagalan mereka untuk mengejar dalang sebenar di sebalik skandal 1MDB. Pihak pembelaan berhujah bahawa siasatan yang tergesa-gesa dan saksi yang meragukan telah mencemarkan kes ini, sekali gus menyerlahkan perjuangan berterusan Najib untuk ketelusan dan keadilan.
All other narratives on Najib in the media, social media and court of public perception, remains unmitigated vilification of the former Prime Minister, based not on the rule of law, the basis of the Constitution.
Under the original 12 year jail sentence imposed by the High Court on the disputed RM42m SRC International conviction, former Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak would be free on 23 August 2026, however by Agong's allegedly flawed Decree -- unsafe in law -- he may be freed, as per letter from Pardons' Board, only on 23 August 2028!
Netanyahu and Israel must be dragged before an International War Crimes Tribunal to be convened by the UN at the International Criminal Court (ICC) at the Hague
Originating Summons, clearly not remedy in law, may be persuasive authority as Declaration, but not needed on Pardon for former Prime Minister Najib!
Commentary and...
If media degenerates into sensationalism based on click baits on court cases, the public perceptions built up by the 'false' narrative may mislead the...
There's case for review of media 'community standards' for compliance with law
There's the belief among cynics that "the media, being an unthinking animal, prevents...