Delays in issuing written grounds of judgment are not uncommon in complex cases. But when such delays extend well beyond established timelines, do they begin to affect an accused person’s ability to exercise a meaningful right of appeal?
From Enron to Carillion, corporate failures have shown that shared decisions carry shared consequences. The SRC civil case ruling raises a difficult question — why does that principle appear unevenly applied?
By Bob Morshidi
https://youtu.be/mn5-TQ-SjB4
In 2019, one of the schools I was teaching were putting on an adaptation of Disney’s Mulan for its yearly school Drama...
Without a doubt, 2020 has been a most trying and challenging year. With COVID-19 rearing its tentacles everywhere most Malaysians have been confined to...