In Part 1, we examined why the 2016 South China Sea arbitral award continues to raise legitimate legal questions. In Part 2, we shift the focus to a more fundamental issue: how Malaysia should advance its own interests in the South China Sea. From the historical legacy of the "Malayan Sea" to recent developments at Pulau Layang-Layang, Lawyer Nor Hisham Mohd Nor argues that Malaysia must articulate a distinctly Malaysian narrative rooted in sovereignty, history and national interest.
The Court of Appeal has fixed timelines for Rosmah Mansor’s application to adduce fresh evidence in her solar hybrid project appeal, with the motion tentatively set to be heard on 1 September — the date previously reserved for the start of her substantive appeal.
Law education in Malaysia does not turn out brilliant lawyers who can contribute to novel developments
In taking the cue from former Prime Minister Najib...
PART 2: THE JEWS AND MUSLIMS IN THE MIDDLE EAST
Many misunderstandings about Jewish-Muslim relationships have been blown out-of-proportion, whence before 1948, there was almost...
By Apocryphalist
After having proposed some very innovative (albeit provocative) suggestions as to how Malaysians can move from now on, in lieu of the recent...