As the tenth anniversary of the South China Sea arbitral award approaches, renewed efforts are underway to portray the ruling as the definitive legal framework for resolving disputes in the South China Sea. Some governments, advocacy groups and foreign policy commentators are expected to use the anniversary to reinforce a particular narrative about the dispute and its implications for the region. Yet, before Malaysians accept such narratives at face value, it is worth revisiting the legal questions that continue to surround the award ten years after it was issued. Lawyer Nor Hisham Mohd Nor writes in Part 1.
Kempen "Jom Cuti! Bersama Wira & Manja" memperkenalkan pengalaman penginapan bertemakan hidupan liar Malaysia serta pakej mesra keluarga bagi menggalakkan rakyat meneroka destinasi tempatan
Law education in Malaysia does not turn out brilliant lawyers who can contribute to novel developments
In taking the cue from former Prime Minister Najib...
PART 2: THE JEWS AND MUSLIMS IN THE MIDDLE EAST
Many misunderstandings about Jewish-Muslim relationships have been blown out-of-proportion, whence before 1948, there was almost...
By Apocryphalist
After having proposed some very innovative (albeit provocative) suggestions as to how Malaysians can move from now on, in lieu of the recent...