Delays in issuing written grounds of judgment are not uncommon in complex cases. But when such delays extend well beyond established timelines, do they begin to affect an accused person’s ability to exercise a meaningful right of appeal?
From Enron to Carillion, corporate failures have shown that shared decisions carry shared consequences. The SRC civil case ruling raises a difficult question — why does that principle appear unevenly applied?
ULASAN oleh Joe Fernandez
Pada asasnya, sebuah Pendapat bukanlah undang-undang. Perihal ini perlu dinyatakan terlebih dahulu. Hanya mahkamah yang berhak dan layak mengisytiharkan undang-undang.
Parlimen pula...
PILIHAN Raya Negeri Sabah 2020 (PRN Sabah) telah dijadikan medan untuk memaparkan apa yang berlaku ketika Shafie Afdal menjadi Menteri Persekutuan dan Ketua Menteri...