In Part 1, we examined why the 2016 South China Sea arbitral award continues to raise legitimate legal questions. In Part 2, we shift the focus to a more fundamental issue: how Malaysia should advance its own interests in the South China Sea. From the historical legacy of the "Malayan Sea" to recent developments at Pulau Layang-Layang, Lawyer Nor Hisham Mohd Nor argues that Malaysia must articulate a distinctly Malaysian narrative rooted in sovereignty, history and national interest.
The Court of Appeal has fixed timelines for Rosmah Mansor’s application to adduce fresh evidence in her solar hybrid project appeal, with the motion tentatively set to be heard on 1 September — the date previously reserved for the start of her substantive appeal.
Ex-PM Najib Razak, taking the cue from the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA'63), began devolution of powers by way of transfer of greater administrative authority...
High Court of Borneo recognises Sulu heirs, cured defect, in 1939!
The Sulu heirs, in seeking compensation in Arbitration for alleged Breach, will end the...
TERAJU takes this effort under the PMD to spur new export opportunities for Sabah SMEs
Kota Kinabalu - Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (PMD),...
RANAU: Tremors from the 3.7-magnitude earthquake which struck Kundasang, Sabah, at 9.28 am Tuesday (April 26), were not only felt by residents in the...
No proof Sulu claimants collected previous compensation payments from the Philippines government
Putrajaya may not rush to judgment on Sabah even if it looks like...
Special preference for illegal immigrants in Sabah 'unthinkable' in law!
There are several relevant points in the following link for this Commentary and Analysis on...