The defence in former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s RM42 million civil suit has challenged the basis for the full claim, pointing to bank records showing RM30 million was credited back into SRC International’s own account within 12 days of the December 2014 transactions.
Ten years is a long time to show up for people. For Dorsett, it has meant a decade of welcoming guests, creating memories and building connections with the communities it calls home.
They thought Barisan Nasional was finished. They were wrong. After its historic defeat in GE14, the coalition many had written off is once again finding its footing — and its voice. From the stunning wins in Johor and Negeri Sembilan to the growing unease within the Unity Government, Hasnah Rahman and Emma Harith look at the rise of Barisan Nasional, its renewed confidence and the new generation that could determine whether this is a comeback — or the beginning of something bigger.
From Enron to Carillion, corporate failures have shown that shared decisions carry shared consequences. The SRC civil case ruling raises a difficult question — why does that principle appear unevenly applied?
Penghakiman kes sivil SRC yang meletakkan liabiliti ke atas Datuk Seri Najib Razak menimbulkan persoalan besar mengenai akauntabiliti sebenar, peranan lembaga pengarah, dan sejauh mana prinsip tadbir urus korporat dihormati dalam keputusan ini.
Bekas CEO 1MDB Datuk Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi memberitahu Mahkamah Tinggi bahawa bekas perdana menteri Najib Razak tidak mengurus secara mikro SRC International atau 1MDB dan tidak pernah mengarahkannya mempengaruhi keputusan lembaga pengarah.
Former 1MDB CEO Datuk Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi told the High Court that SRC International decisions were not micromanaged by former prime minister Najib Razak, agreeing he had never been instructed to direct the board on corporate matters.
In Malaysia, the phrases "kangaroo court" and "hanging judge" have taken on a chilling significance in the wake of controversial legal proceedings involving former Prime Minister Najib Razak.
Pengakuan Pejabat Peguam Negara selepas 527 hari bahawa wujudnya Adendum Diraja – yang membenarkan bekas Perdana Menteri Najib Razak menjalani baki hukuman penjaranya di bawah tahanan rumah – telah mencetuskan kemarahan ramai. Peguam-peguam kanan memberi amaran bahawa isu ini boleh menjadi liabiliti besar kepada kerajaan Madani, menimbulkan persepsi bahawa mereka cuba menyembunyikan sesuatu.
The Attorney General’s belated admission after 527 days that a Royal Addendum exists – decreeing former Prime Minister Najib Razak should serve his sentence under house arrest – has sparked outrage, with senior lawyers warning that this debacle is a ticking time bomb for the Madani government, creating the impression it has something to hide.
Setelah bertahun-tahun melalui penangguhan dan halangan perundangan, keadilan akhirnya berpihak kepada Datuk Seri Najib Razak. Bekas Perdana Menteri itu telah diberikan Perintah Pelepasan Tanpa Pembebasan (DNAA) dalam kes pengubahan wang haram SRC 2.0 yang berjumlah RM27 juta, sekaligus menamatkan perjuangan undang-undangnya yang panjang
After years of delays and legal setbacks, justice has finally prevailed for Dato’ Sri Najib Razak. The former Prime Minister was granted a Discharge Not Amounting to an Acquittal (DNAA) in the long-standing RM27 million SRC 2.0 money laundering case, bringing an end to his drawn-out legal battle.
Former Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has filed a damning police report through his lawyer against former Attorney General Tan Sri Ahmad Terrirudin, accusing him of deceiving the courts and suppressing a royal decree granting home detention.
Diam membisu bekas Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh dan penggantinya, Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar, mengenai dakwaan kewujudan satu ‘addendum’ perintah tahanan rumah terhadap Datuk Seri Najib Razak semakin menimbulkan kebimbangan dalam kalangan rakyat dan pemerhati undang-undang.