As the tenth anniversary of the South China Sea arbitral award approaches, renewed efforts are underway to portray the ruling as the definitive legal framework for resolving disputes in the South China Sea. Some governments, advocacy groups and foreign policy commentators are expected to use the anniversary to reinforce a particular narrative about the dispute and its implications for the region. Yet, before Malaysians accept such narratives at face value, it is worth revisiting the legal questions that continue to surround the award ten years after it was issued. Lawyer Nor Hisham Mohd Nor writes in Part 1.
Kempen "Jom Cuti! Bersama Wira & Manja" memperkenalkan pengalaman penginapan bertemakan hidupan liar Malaysia serta pakej mesra keluarga bagi menggalakkan rakyat meneroka destinasi tempatan
Negara sedang berdepan dengan keadaan yang cukup mencabar untuk memulihkan semula tabung-tabung dan rizab negara setelah kerosakan sangat teruk ditinggalkan oleh Kerajaan PH dan...
PUTRAJAYA, Thurs: The Court of Appeal today dismissed the appeal by ex-premier Najib Razak against the High Court's September 2020 decision to strike out...
COMMENT and ANALYSIS by Joe Fernandez
At the very outset, it must be stated, that Opinion isn’t law. Only the court can declare law.
Parliament makes...
KUALA LUMPUR: Ihsan Perdana Sdn Bhd (IPSB) managing director Datuk Dr Shamsul Anwar Sulaiman only knew that he had deposited RM42 million into Datuk...
The testimony of a bank branch
manager in the on-going corruption trial of Datuk Seri Najib Razak today has
raised several startling questions, mainly on the...