Karl Marx And His Hidden Relations With Capitalists


A lot of brainwashed people believe in either Capitalism or Communism as if they are both ‘religions’ (of terrorism). The Capitalists believe their ideology is right while the Communists believe it too but in a very different way, but I feel like both are in the wrong and there is a much bigger picture in this than just some rhetoric and what both sides ‘think’. To get to the bottom of this, we need to start with Karl Heinrich Marx, the founder of Communism and what his relations with Capitalists really are.

Marx’s Early Years

To start with, we first look at Karl Marx’s origins. Karl Heinrich Marx (Birth name is Chaim Herschel Mordechai) was born to a Jewish couple, Herschel HaLevi (Heinrich Marx) and Henriette Pressburg on 5 May 1818 in Trier, an ancient city in Kingdom of Prussia (Modern Day Germany). Marx’s maternal grandfather was a Dutch Rabbi named Isaac Heymans Pressburg who was married to Nanette Salomons Cohen, while his paternal line (Marx HaLevi Mordechai and Eva Lwow) had supplied Trier’s Rabbis since 1723. Marx’s family, including him, was a family of Secular Jews. Marx was also a Freemason.

Herschel was the first in line as a child to receive secular indoctrination and became an upper/middle class lawyer who owned a number of Moselle vineyards. Karl Marx’s maternal side of his family founded a Capitalist Company known as Philips Electronics in 1891.

Connections With Zionist Capitalists

Marx was married to the Prussian Noble family member known as Johanna Bertha Julie Jenny von Westphalen, who was known as a member of a rich family even by Marx himself. The Westphalians had deep ties to intelligence services and secret societies, who always wanted to know about revolutionaries and ideological networks. Marx worked for the Prussian Government as a police spy, took a leading position in the Socialist Movement (First International Organization) on behalf of his government and drove the movements into a direction that was useful for the Prussian Government according to Der Preußische Regierungsagent Karl Marx, a book by Wolfgang Waldner.

Jenny von Westphalen Karl Marxs noble wife Photo credit Camera Press

It must be remembered that Marx’s employer was Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston. It was under Palmerston’s employment that Karl Marx founded Communism and wrote the Communist Manifesto together with Friedrich Engels Junior for Palmerston. Palmerston instigated the Crimean War, Taipei Rebellion, American Civil War and various crises in India and Burma/Myanmar.

Speaking of Friedrich Engels Junior, he was born to a couple, Friedrich Engels Senior and Elisabeth “Elise” Franziska Mauritia von Haar on 28 November 1820. Engels’ family owned large cotton-textile mills in Barmen and Salford. Engels and Marx became best friends in the 1840s and were both members of the Masonic Unity of Truth Lodge.

Marx moved to London, UK in 1849… Lionel de Rothschild, member of the British Parliament and a Zionist Capitalist family, the Rothschild Cartel was a cousin of Marx who was authoring Das Kapital in a British Museum. The Rothschild and Bleichroder raised money for Junker Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck, a German Nationalist leader. Bismarck and the Prussian Nobility relied on the Rothschild’s information network abroad. Lionel handled a huge amount of money for the British Empire.

In the same year, Clinton Roosevelt (member of the powerful Zionist Capitalist Roosevelt family) and Horace Greeley, the owner of New York Tribune Propaganda media, had raised money for Marx and his London Communist League. Greeley gave the Communists regular commissions for articles that were to appear in his propaganda. These are examples of Capitalists promoting Communists and their work.

The idea of Marx being a Capitalist puppet came from Mikhail Bakunin, Marx’s rival who was kicked out of First International. Bakunin wrote: “This world is now, at least for the most part, at the disposal of Marx on the one hand, and of Rothschild on the other. This may seem strange. What can there be in common between socialism and a leading bank? The point is that authoritarian socialism, Marxist communism, demands a strong centralisation of the state. And where there is centralization of the state, there must necessarily be a central bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, speculating with the Labour of the people, will be found,” – Mikhail Bakunin, Profession de foi d’un démocrate socialiste russe précédé d’une étude sur les juifs allemands, 1869.

“Karl Marx’s cousin, Dr. Phil Marx in Breslau, to whom I owe the information about Marx’s family, provided me with a very comprehensive collection, partially comprising legal decisions on the basis of the Talmud, and partially comprising theological treatises composed by the mentioned rabbis.” (Adler 1887: 226n1)

Communists and Capitalists have the exact same Zionist end goal, they work together since 1800s on a global scale to achieve the New World Order via international technocratic tyranny that will falsely claim to give the world ‘equality’ while destroying all borders, privacy and private properties they disagree with (while the only ones who can keep private properties and privacy are the Capitalists and Communist elites), not even the underwear you wear will be yours anymore, further making this so-called “peace and equality” very degenerate. This is the illusion of “world peace” that they want to promote. If you are critical about this, Communists will call you a “Fascist Imperialist” while the Capitalists will call you a “Lazy Communist Conspiracy Theorist”.

To do this, both Capitalists and Communists need central banks based on a credit based system (Chinese and Soviet banks) as one of the biggest steps to make it easier, most don’t know this, but before credit-based banking system existed, Marx actually talked about how central banks based on oppressive credit systems are important for a ‘Successful’ Communist State. In other words, this is a prediction for Chinese and Soviet banks. Very ‘revolutionary’, eh?

Marx died of bronchitis and pleurisy in London on 14 March 1883 at the age of 64 and Engels died in London on 5 August 1895 at the age of 74. Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov’s brother, Aleksandr Ilyich Ulaynov (both Jewish) had translated Marx’s texts from German and English to Russian and was involved in an assassination plot against the Russian Tsar Aleksandr III Aleksandrovich. Vladimir Ulyanov himself aka Lenin referred to Marx and raised him into a quasi-holy idol. Thanks to Lenin’s Pro-Communist praise and leadership, Marxism became known as Marxism-Leninism. Lenin was also a Freemason.

Judging by Marx’s actions and connections with Capitalists, wouldn’t that make Marx an Imperialist and Pro-Capitalist himself? I am not promoting Fascism here, but Communists of many types are undoubtedly Controlled Opposition as shown by Lenin’s quote saying “the best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” And his connections with oppositions to Anti-Judaism, but that will be another topic for another day.

If oppositions are Capitalists Communists Anarchists Imperialists Zionists or other evil ideologies then they are Controlled Opposition Photo by Quotefancy

There are Anti-Fascists and Anti-Capitalists that oppose Communism as well like Mustafa Busuladzic (the link is in Bosnian so you have to translate the page) and Alija Izetbegovic. If you oppose Capitalism while embracing Communism or oppose Communism while embracing Capitalist Imperialism, then chances are you have never experienced the real truth about both ideologies in your entire life. In other words, there is no such thing as “innocent Communists” and the only good Communist is a dead Communist! – New Malaysia Herald

About the writer: Aidel Morshidi is a 19 year old with Aspergers and has a keen interest in world affairs. Being on the Autism Spectrum does not prevent him from trying his luck in the much-extended SPM exams although he had spent 3 years in special education.

Note: The views expressed in this article are that of the writer’s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the New Malaysia Herald.


Facebook Comments