As the tenth anniversary of the South China Sea arbitral award approaches, renewed efforts are underway to portray the ruling as the definitive legal framework for resolving disputes in the South China Sea. Some governments, advocacy groups and foreign policy commentators are expected to use the anniversary to reinforce a particular narrative about the dispute and its implications for the region. Yet, before Malaysians accept such narratives at face value, it is worth revisiting the legal questions that continue to surround the award ten years after it was issued. Lawyer Nor Hisham Mohd Nor writes in Part 1.
Kempen "Jom Cuti! Bersama Wira & Manja" memperkenalkan pengalaman penginapan bertemakan hidupan liar Malaysia serta pakej mesra keluarga bagi menggalakkan rakyat meneroka destinasi tempatan
The great majority may not be familiar with Judge Nazlan and Najib's RM42m SRC International case
Democracy, according to spiritualist, mystic and yogi SadhGuru, only...
Media Acting As Judge, Jury And Hangman On Najib's SRC And Numerous Other Cases, Unprecedented In History!
There are numerous issues in law which may...
DAP veteran leader Lim Kit Siang's dramatic statement about Najib underlines the urgent national need for a Royal Commission of Inquiry on political donations
There...
Memoirs based on selective amnesia raise more questions than are answered
History probably may not judge almost all of the spate of local Memoirs kindly....
RM pegging, last resort for stability, should be introduced if there's volatility, firstly as policy which 'may' be enforced.
In PART 1 we saw "Consumers,...