In Part 1, we examined why the 2016 South China Sea arbitral award continues to raise legitimate legal questions. In Part 2, we shift the focus to a more fundamental issue: how Malaysia should advance its own interests in the South China Sea. From the historical legacy of the "Malayan Sea" to recent developments at Pulau Layang-Layang, Lawyer Nor Hisham Mohd Nor argues that Malaysia must articulate a distinctly Malaysian narrative rooted in sovereignty, history and national interest.
The Court of Appeal has fixed timelines for Rosmah Mansor’s application to adduce fresh evidence in her solar hybrid project appeal, with the motion tentatively set to be heard on 1 September — the date previously reserved for the start of her substantive appeal.
The great majority may not be familiar with Judge Nazlan and Najib's RM42m SRC International case
Democracy, according to spiritualist, mystic and yogi SadhGuru, only...
Media Acting As Judge, Jury And Hangman On Najib's SRC And Numerous Other Cases, Unprecedented In History!
There are numerous issues in law which may...
DAP veteran leader Lim Kit Siang's dramatic statement about Najib underlines the urgent national need for a Royal Commission of Inquiry on political donations
There...
Memoirs based on selective amnesia raise more questions than are answered
History probably may not judge almost all of the spate of local Memoirs kindly....
RM pegging, last resort for stability, should be introduced if there's volatility, firstly as policy which 'may' be enforced.
In PART 1 we saw "Consumers,...