As the tenth anniversary of the South China Sea arbitral award approaches, renewed efforts are underway to portray the ruling as the definitive legal framework for resolving disputes in the South China Sea. Some governments, advocacy groups and foreign policy commentators are expected to use the anniversary to reinforce a particular narrative about the dispute and its implications for the region. Yet, before Malaysians accept such narratives at face value, it is worth revisiting the legal questions that continue to surround the award ten years after it was issued. Lawyer Nor Hisham Mohd Nor writes in Part 1.
Kempen "Jom Cuti! Bersama Wira & Manja" memperkenalkan pengalaman penginapan bertemakan hidupan liar Malaysia serta pakej mesra keluarga bagi menggalakkan rakyat meneroka destinasi tempatan
Chief justice says broad grounds on the issue already given
PUTRAJAYA - The Federal Court has disallowed Former Prime Minister Najib Razak's lawyer, Hisyam...
There's a case for miscarriage of justice arising from an allegedly 'tainted' SRC conviction based on the mistrial
Former Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's plight...
Many from the ‘dark side’ (referring to Pakatan Harapan and their residues) had massive pre-ejaculations after local media outlets reported that former Prime Minister...
By Aathi Shankar
The prosecution had failed to establish a prima facie case against former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak pertaining to the corruption...
By Aathi Shankar
Syed Husin Ali has recently slammed Tun Mahathir Mohamad as the politician responsible for all ills crippling the nation.
Syed Husin blamed Mahathir...
By Aathi Shankar
Datuk Amhari Efendi Nazaruddin received more than USD1 million from notorious fugitive businessman Low Taek Jho or Jho Low.
However, the former special...