Delays in issuing written grounds of judgment are not uncommon in complex cases. But when such delays extend well beyond established timelines, do they begin to affect an accused person’s ability to exercise a meaningful right of appeal?
From Enron to Carillion, corporate failures have shown that shared decisions carry shared consequences. The SRC civil case ruling raises a difficult question — why does that principle appear unevenly applied?
By: John Berthelsen (Asia Sentinel)
On October 17, Halim Saad, the executive chairman of Renong Group, bid RM5.2 billion (US$1.24 billion) in an attempt to...
By Aathi Shankar
It’s time for Pakatan Harapan to cease its misleading propaganda on the so-called “61 years of failures”.
If 61 years of first Alliance...