Dalam hiruk-pikuk politik dan polemik, sumbangan sosial sering menjadi mangsa pertama yang dipadam. Namun perjumpaan Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor bersama pelajar dan keluarga Program Permata Pintar mengingatkan bahawa kerja kebajikan yang konsisten dan berimpak tidak wajar dinilai melalui lensa politik semata-mata.
In Malaysia, the phrases "kangaroo court" and "hanging judge" have taken on a chilling significance in the wake of controversial legal proceedings involving former Prime Minister Najib Razak.
Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah’s response to the authorities’ press statement goes beyond defending Najib Razak. It underscores wider concerns about constitutional rights, judicial independence, and Malaysia’s global credibility at a time when political pressures risk shaping public perception of justice.
Malaysia’s constitutional monarchy faces a defining test as the courts decide whether the King’s explicit clemency directives — recorded in the Royal Addendum — were faithfully implemented or quietly diluted.
The Attorney General’s belated admission after 527 days that a Royal Addendum exists – decreeing former Prime Minister Najib Razak should serve his sentence under house arrest – has sparked outrage, with senior lawyers warning that this debacle is a ticking time bomb for the Madani government, creating the impression it has something to hide.
Diam membisu bekas Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh dan penggantinya, Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar, mengenai dakwaan kewujudan satu ‘addendum’ perintah tahanan rumah terhadap Datuk Seri Najib Razak semakin menimbulkan kebimbangan dalam kalangan rakyat dan pemerhati undang-undang.
As Najib Razak takes legal aim at the former Attorney General over an alleged cover-up involving a Royal Addendum Order, the controversy is set to spark deeper debate at this Saturday’s Townhall Rakyat on law, justice, and constitutional rights.
Former PM’s fight for house arrest continues as courts pause proceedings; even judges express frustration over the prolonged delay in the Royal Addendum issue
Ancaman perintah sekatan bersuara terhadap Adendum Diraja yang diarahkan oleh hakim untuk kerajaan memohon secara rasmi pada hari Isnin, 20 Januari, telah mencetuskan perdebatan meluas. Pelbagai kiriman sarkastik telah membanjiri media sosial, dengan sesetengah melihatnya sebagai penjelasan prerogatif diraja, ada yang berkata mengenai sekatan hak bersuara, manakala yang lain melihatnya sebagai ancaman kepada kebebasan kehakiman.
The laughable threat of a gag order on the Royal Addendum, which the judge has directed the government to formally apply for by Monday, 20 January, has sparked widespread debate. Memes and sarcastic posts have flooded social media, with some viewing it as a clarification of the royal prerogative, while others see it as a potential threat to judicial independence.
At a time when Malaysians are busy doing their weekend shopping and enjoying their year-end festivities, they were surprised to read a press statement by the Attorney-General Chambers (AGC) issued this afternoon about the issue of Pardon by the King
Baffled individuals from all the states in Malaysia share their thoughts regarding Wednesday's judicial review pertaining to the Royal Addendum order and most expressed disbelief about the actions of the government