Nine remarkable mothers were recognised for turning deeply personal journeys of raising children with special needs into advocacy, empowerment and meaningful change for others through Anugerah Ibu Kiwanis 2026.
A Facebook post about an autistic young man who sometimes makes his way from his home in Mont Kiara to his former school in Kiaramas led to an unexpected invitation from Dorsett Hartamas – and a stay that was about much more than a night at a hotel.
KUALA LUMPUR: In an age when businesses are increasingly turning to technology and artificial intelligence, Sophia Natasya...
During the 1MDB Civil Trial, Liquidator Angela Barkhouse told the High Court that her team traced allegedly misappropriated 1MDB funds through a complex network of 29 offshore entities, while acknowledging that her findings were based on a retrospective reconciliation and that she could not confirm the final total amount recovered.
The opening week of the 1MDB Civil Trial has evolved into more than a dispute over who should bear responsibility for losses allegedly suffered by 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB). While the defence has questioned the basis of the RM24 billion claim in light of substantial recoveries, cross-examination of investigator Richard Templeman, challenges to the reliability of board minutes and objections to portions of Tony Pua's witness statement have placed the evidential foundation of the plaintiffs' case under scrutiny.
Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah questioned the basis of the government's RM24 billion civil suit against Datuk Seri Najib Razak after revealing that more than RM31 billion linked to 1MDB had already been recovered by authorities.
From Enron to Carillion, corporate failures have shown that shared decisions carry shared consequences. The SRC civil case ruling raises a difficult question — why does that principle appear unevenly applied?
Penghakiman terhadap mantan Perdana Menteri Malaysia, Datuk Seri Najib Razak menimbulkan persoalan serius sama ada keadilan sedang dilaksanakan secara seimbang, atau telah berubah menjadi hukuman yang bersifat menghukum secara berlebihan hingga menyerupai penghinaan awam.
Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah’s response to the authorities’ press statement goes beyond defending Najib Razak. It underscores wider concerns about constitutional rights, judicial independence, and Malaysia’s global credibility at a time when political pressures risk shaping public perception of justice.
Selepas seminggu hujahan, pasukan pembelaan Najib Razak berjaya menelanjangkan dakwaan pendakwaan — mendedahkan percanggahan, keterangan hearsay dan dwistandard yang ketara, daripada isu derma Arab Saudi yang sah hingga kepada dalang sebenar yang masih bebas.
Pengakuan Pejabat Peguam Negara selepas 527 hari bahawa wujudnya Adendum Diraja – yang membenarkan bekas Perdana Menteri Najib Razak menjalani baki hukuman penjaranya di bawah tahanan rumah – telah mencetuskan kemarahan ramai. Peguam-peguam kanan memberi amaran bahawa isu ini boleh menjadi liabiliti besar kepada kerajaan Madani, menimbulkan persepsi bahawa mereka cuba menyembunyikan sesuatu.
The Attorney General’s belated admission after 527 days that a Royal Addendum exists – decreeing former Prime Minister Najib Razak should serve his sentence under house arrest – has sparked outrage, with senior lawyers warning that this debacle is a ticking time bomb for the Madani government, creating the impression it has something to hide.
Kontroversi mengenai Addendum Diraja yang membenarkan Najib Razak menjalani baki hukuman penjara di rumah menimbulkan persoalan mengenai peranan titah Raja dan sama ada sesetengah pihak dalam kerajaan kini mengabaikan kuasa Diraja.
The controversy surrounding the Royal Addendum that allows Najib Razak to serve his remaining prison sentence at home raises questions about the role of the King’s decrees and whether certain government officials are undermining Royal authority.
Setelah bertahun-tahun melalui penangguhan dan halangan perundangan, keadilan akhirnya berpihak kepada Datuk Seri Najib Razak. Bekas Perdana Menteri itu telah diberikan Perintah Pelepasan Tanpa Pembebasan (DNAA) dalam kes pengubahan wang haram SRC 2.0 yang berjumlah RM27 juta, sekaligus menamatkan perjuangan undang-undangnya yang panjang