As the tenth anniversary of the South China Sea arbitral award approaches, renewed efforts are underway to portray the ruling as the definitive legal framework for resolving disputes in the South China Sea. Some governments, advocacy groups and foreign policy commentators are expected to use the anniversary to reinforce a particular narrative about the dispute and its implications for the region. Yet, before Malaysians accept such narratives at face value, it is worth revisiting the legal questions that continue to surround the award ten years after it was issued. Lawyer Nor Hisham Mohd Nor writes in Part 1.
Kempen "Jom Cuti! Bersama Wira & Manja" memperkenalkan pengalaman penginapan bertemakan hidupan liar Malaysia serta pakej mesra keluarga bagi menggalakkan rakyat meneroka destinasi tempatan
PCM President Huan Cheng Guan questioned the organisation's motif of their political attack on Najib
Parti Cinta Malaysia (PCM) slammed the Penang Chinese Chamber of...
Prime Minister Ismail Sabri warned that action will be taken against the former AG (Thomas) for comments in his Memoirs
It wasn't immediately clear whether,...
Witness said Lim was “untouchable” during Pakatan’s reign when investigations into the undersea tunnel project had already commenced then
KUALA LUMPUR, March 23 — The...
Say No! To Gabungan Marriage Of Convenience
Oleh Ramlan Askolani, Setiausaha Perhubungan UMNO Wilayah Perseketuan, Ketua UMNO Bahagian Lembah Pantai
Khabarnya setelah tewas teruk di PRN...
Tidak ada sebarang hasil bond TIA 2009 yang masuk ke akaun Najib, kata bekas pengarah TIA/1MDB
Kes 1MDB disambung semula kelmarin dengan Ismee Ismail, bekas...